<Back

GALIOT AI in Action - Part I
Summarization and Key Report Entities Identifications

folder

The Goal: Extracting Meaningful Insights From Report Data Overload

Safety and security teams often face a daunting challenge: how to efficiently process hundreds, sometimes thousands, of reports to extract meaningful insights, prioritize critical issues, and disseminate vital information in a timely manner.
This is where GALIOT AI, powered by cutting-edge Generative AI technology, steps in.
Our technology helps your team to quickly prioritize safety and security reports by providing a meaningful synopsis and highlighting key data. It also streamlines the creation of short, essential safety/security bulletins for broader organizational awareness.

See How GALIOT AI Summarization & Key Facts Identification Works

Here's GALIOT AI in action, generating a synopsis and extracting key data from a randomly selected report from the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) database.
(To ensure privacy, reports from the ASRS database are deidentified, meaning all personal information and airport identifications has been removed or masked.")

Safety Report Narrative:

We departed Runway XX in ZZZ, at approximately 2,000 ft and 210 kts, we received EICAS message ""Yaw Damper Fail"" and moments later followed by ""Rudder System 1-2 INOP.""
Asked the First Officer (FO) who was pilot flying, ´how does the aircraft feel? If you need the rudders they will feel stiff and require more pressure.´FO was pilot flying (PF and I transferred radios to him, and I began to run the QRH for ´Rudder System 1-2 INOP.´ Completed the QRH and pushed out the Rudder Shutoff 2. This then only showed Rudder System 2 INOP.We elected to continue to ZZZ1 since there are longer runways, larger emergency vehicle presence, and we needed time to complete the QRH. ZZZ had Runway XY/XZ closed.After we had completed the QRH for the Rudder System INOP, we then completed the QRH for ´Yaw Damper Fail.´ We were then able to regain the Yaw Damper and Autopilot.We [requested priority handling] with ZZZ Approach, requested Runway XAC, and asked for emergency vehicles to standby as a precautionary measure. ZZZ Approach gave us priority handing and had us go direct to ZZZZZ and descend and maintain 8,000 from 12,000 and expect the Visual XAC. I (pilot monitoring (PM)) set up the Flight Instruments, Radios, and FMS for Runway XAC and briefed the approach while the FO was pilot flying (PF). Advised the Flight Attendant (FA) what was occurring and that it was a precautionary landing and we did not plan to evacuate. I then made an announcement to the passengers advising them of the precautionary anding, and to remain seated with seatbelts fastened. The message to Dispatch did not send advising of our problem. We later saw it never sent once we were safely on the ground taxing to the gate.With this priority handling we were given direct ZZZZZ and then once closer we were given a heading of 030 to join the LOC and cleared for the visual approach Runway XAC. ZZZ Approach advised that we were in trail of a heavy. Thankfully we were high and stayed away from the heavy´s wake. With the priority handling and short cut from the arrival onto the approach, ZZZ Approach still had us high and having us descent at 1,500 FPM or greater to get on glide slope. Once established on the final approach course and descent checklist complete, we had a possible transfer of controls where I became PF and FO became PM.Autopilot was disengaged at approximately 4,000 ft, as a way to better feel the plane´s handling characteristics and to more easily get on glide slope and on speed for the visual approach XAC by the FAF. By 3000 ft we captured glide slope. The flight controls were feeling as normal and the redundancy in the rudder system was working correctly. We safely landed on Runway XAC. Once at a safe speed I used the tiler to slightly maneuver the nose wheel to the right to make sure we had nose wheel steer. We did have nose wheel steering and cleared the runway at Taxiway 1 and pulled into the ramp at [spot] XX and set the parking brake. We then cancelled the [priority handling] since we had operable steering and then completed the after landing checklist. I advised the FA and passengers that we safely landed in ZZZ and to remain seated with seatbelts fastened and that we were going to shortly start moving again on the ramp on our way to our assigned gate.Upon taxing to the gate we messaged Dispatch about the priority handling and system failure, and then called ZZZ Operations to advise them to have extra staff on hand at the gate to answer any passenger questions and concerns after the event. This way it provided the FA some help with assisting passengers. FO completed a post flight inspection of the hydraulic systems and the aircraft and everything looked normal. Reported the incident with Maintenance Control and Dispatch and answered all questions asked. Completed logbook entries for the Rudder System Failure. Aircraft had recently come out of a heavy check and had been in long term storage.The training department has done a great job with training us pilots and flight attendants. The procedures and training in place helped maintain positive control of the aircraft and successfully determine the priority of which EICAS indications to tackle first. FA stayed calm, cool, and collected. This assured passengers everything would be okay. FO was a rockstar.! He handled radios and flying the aircraft by hand while I completed the QRH to try and regain at least one of the rudder systems and then once safe we engaged the autopilot to test it integrity and reduce his work load while I was doing procedures.


GALIOT AI Generated Output:

Report Summary:
Shortly after departure, the crew received EICAS messages for a 'Yaw Damper Fail' and 'Rudder System 1-2 INOP'.
The crew ran the appropriate checklists, regained some system functionality, and requested priority handling for a precautionary landing at an airport with longer runways and larger emergency vehicle presence.
The aircraft landed safely on Runway XAC after the crew flew a visual approach to assess the aircraft's handling characteristics.

Contributing Factors:
- Aircraft had recently come out of a heavy check;
- Aircraft had been in long term storage;
Events:
- Yaw Damper Fail;
- Rudder System Failure;
Flight Phases
- Climb;
- Landing;
Outcomes (Severity)
- Precautionary landing
Aircraft Components:
- Yaw Damper;
- Rudder Shutoff 2;
- Rudder System 1-2;
- Nose wheel;
Immediate Action Taken:
- Ran the QRH for 'Rudder System 1-2 INOP';
- Shutoff 2;
- Completed the QRH for 'Yaw Damper Fail';
- Requested priority handling;
- Asked for emergency vehicles to standby;
- Made an announcement to the passengers;
- Disengaged Autopilot to feel the plane's handling characteristics;
- Reported the incident with Maintenance Control and Dispatch;
- Completed logbook entries;
ATC Instructions:
- Gave us priority handing;
- Go direct to ZZZZZ;
- Descend and maintain 8,000;
- Expect the Visual XAC;
- Given a heading of 030 to join the LOC;
- Cleared for the visual approach Runway XAC;
Altitude Flight Levels:
- 2,000 ft;
- 12,000 ft;
- 8,000 ft;
- 4,000 ft;
- 3000 ft;

Try more here!

Marino Tudor

Founder & CEO
GALIOT Aero Ltd
October, 2025